The following are some of the notable verdicts and settlements Morris, King & Hodge, P.C., have obtained for our clients:

Settlement
Automobile
$575,000
Automobile – Injury

Settlement against a driver who ran off the road and caused serious injury to a client.

Settlement
Automobile
$550,000
Automobile – Injury

Settlement for a client who sustained permanent physical injuries and disfigurement after a motor vehicle collision with an 18-wheeler.

Settlement
Automobile
$550,000
Automobile – Injury - Tractor Trailer

Settlement of a Mississippi case of a hit and run accident with a tractor trailer.

Settlement
Premises Liability
$475,000
Premises Liability – Injury

Settlement for a client injured out of state.

Settlement
Premises Liability
$450,000
Premises Liability – Injury

Settlement for a client who sustained serious injuries after a fall at a local shopping center.

Settlement
Automobile
$390,000
Automobile – Injury

Settlement against a dump truck driver who struck our client, resulting in a punctured lung injury.

Load More Icon

Morris, King & Hodge, P.C., in Huntsville, Alabama has been helping injured victims in Alabama since 1966. We handle a variety of cases including:

In addition to the above verdicts and settlements, the following cases resulted in reported decisions in appellate courts:

  • Ex Parte Edgetech I.G., Inc., 159 So. 3d 629 (2014)
  • Alabama Powersport Auction, LLC v. Wiese, 143 So. 3d 713 (2013)
  • Ex parte U.S. Innovations Grp., Inc., 141 So. 3d 459 (2013)
  • Morton v. Kirkwood, 707 F. 3d 1236 11th Cir. (2013)
  • Weaver v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 106 So.3d 417 Ala. Civ. App. (2012)
  • Allsopp v. Bolding, 86 So.3d 952 (2011)
  • In re Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc., 400 B.R. 795 (2009)
  • Ex parte W.L. Halsey Grocery Co., 897 So.2d 1028 (Ala. 2004)

Disclaimer: These prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Your case may differ from the matters in which results were provided. Not all results of cases we handle are provided. The results provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by our firm or of every client’s experience. Every case is different. Each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.