The following are some of the notable verdicts and settlements Morris, King & Hodge, P.C., have obtained for our clients:
Settlement for a family who lost a loved one in a motor vehicle collision where another driver failed to stop at a stop sign and pushed our client into an oncoming 18-wheeler.
Settlement against a medical provider for the wrongful death of a patient. The medical provider administered an overdose of medication resulting in the patient’s death.
Settlement on behalf of farmer when insurance company refused to cover a claim.
Settlement against driver who struck a vehicle causing fatal injuries to our clients.
Settlement for a parent who lost a child in a motor vehicle collision when a road construction worker failed to take appropriate precautions and tried to maneuver a vehicle across three lanes of traffic without putting out any signs or traffic cones to warn of the temporary road hazard.
Settlement of a business dispute regarding the sale of a tech company.
Morris, King & Hodge, P.C., in Huntsville, Alabama, has been helping injured victims in Alabama since 1966. We handle a variety of cases, including:
In addition to the above verdicts and settlements, the following cases resulted in reported decisions in appellate courts:
- Ex Parte Edgetech I.G., Inc., 159 So. 3d 629 (2014)
- Alabama Powersport Auction, LLC v. Wiese, 143 So. 3d 713 (2013)
- Ex parte U.S. Innovations Grp., Inc., 141 So. 3d 459 (2013)
- Morton v. Kirkwood, 707 F. 3d 1236 11th Cir. (2013)
- Weaver v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 106 So.3d 417 Ala. Civ. App. (2012)
- Allsopp v. Bolding, 86 So.3d 952 (2011)
- In re Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc., 400 B.R. 795 (2009)
- Ex parte W.L. Halsey Grocery Co., 897 So.2d 1028 (Ala. 2004)
Disclaimer: These prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Your case may differ from the matters in which results were provided. Not all results of cases we handle are provided. The results provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by our firm or of every client’s experience. Every case is different. Each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.